I think much of this goes back to our religious/spiritual DNA that says those who teach about spirituality should be financially poor. I know you don't believe they should be poor, you made that clear, but I still think it weighs down our clarity in assessing how much money a "spiritual teacher" should possess. I know that any time the media wished to put anyone of religious or spiritual import down (and it could be a meditation teacher or an evangelist) the first place they go is the so-called anachronism of being fiscally wealthy and a spiritual teacher at the same time. He deserves what he generates and I would suspect that a person of such consciousness would likely be consistent in his money practices.